Kitchen planning

Compare upper-cabinet depth with the work performed on the counter below

A deeper upper cabinet can change storage and the space above a task. Test the same counter setup with the finished projection, user position and doors included.

Choose upper-cabinet depth by comparing what it stores with how the counter beneath it is used. A deeper interior may serve a particular dish or group, while the finished front projects farther over the working area. That change can affect the user’s view and movement differently depending on the task and position. Test the actual relationship instead of assuming that extra upper storage has no consequence below.

Define the counter task before evaluating the projection

Identify whether this surface is used for cutting, mixing, assembling food, operating selected equipment or simply setting things down. Lay out the representative board, bowl, supplies and receiving space. Include the person’s ordinary working position and where they look during the task. A counter that appears empty in an elevation does not describe the space needed while its contents are in use.

Separate a view from the room from the view needed to perform work. A cabinet may look balanced from the entrance while affecting what the cook can see near the back of the counter. Use the actual user rather than choosing a convenient eye position for the drawing. Record any movement they make to see or reach the working object.

Compare finished depth and the space beneath it

Obtain the selected cabinet’s complete depth, including the finished front and relevant hardware. Show it above the real counter and any backsplash or other fixed projection affecting the task. Keep the counter arrangement and mounting position consistent while comparing depth alternatives, so a change in another dimension does not get mistaken for a depth benefit.

Kitchen design study with upper cabinets above portions of the right-side counter and drawers below.
Design study The image shows the layered relationship between upper storage and a counter. It does not establish dimensions, a user’s sightline or operating clearance; those require an actual section and task trial.

Use a section or a suitable mockup to test the relationship at the work surface. The upper front can influence different parts of the task differently: viewing a board, lifting a bowl, reaching supplies or opening a piece of equipment are not the same movement. Follow the selected equipment’s own operating requirements rather than inferring compatibility from a cabinet outline.

Test access to the upper cabinet while the task is present

Open the actual proposed door or other front and retrieve the intended item. Its position can change where the user stands over the counter and how the item is brought down. Include the board, bowls and supplies already occupying the top. A deeper cabinet may hold a larger piece while the route from that cabinet to the available landing surface remains awkward.

Check the return too. The user needs a way to place the item back and close the front without assuming that the entire counter will first be cleared. If the layout depends on temporarily moving a bowl or stepping to another position, record that sequence and decide whether it suits the frequency of the stored group.

Compare a platter-storage case with the same preparation task

In a hypothetical kitchen, a large platter is considered for an upper cabinet above the main assembly surface. A deeper cabinet may accommodate its proposed orientation, but the new front projection changes the cook’s view of objects near the back of that surface. Moving the working board forward might improve that view while using the landing place for the next dish. The storage choice has therefore changed more than the cabinet interior.

Compare another verified orientation for the platter, another tested home or the deeper cabinet with a revised task arrangement. Keep the platter and the receiving dish in every option. Do not claim the shallower alternative succeeds by omitting the large item, or the deeper alternative succeeds by removing the preparation task from the drawing. The comparison should preserve the actual work and inventory.

Save the upper storage and counter task as a linked choice

Record the finished upper projection, relevant mounting setting, stored group and the task layout beneath it. Include observations of the working view, hand movements, open-front retrieval and return. Recheck if the upper unit, counter equipment or main user changes. A suitable depth supports its assigned storage and the counter’s real use together, with any required sequence clearly understood.

Pure White
Cream White
Light Warm Gray
Gray
Navy
Black
Oak Tone
Dark Walnut Tone
Design study These finish studies are design references, not a list of currently orderable colors. Screens and lighting change the appearance; compare a physical sample before choosing.
See all finish options →

Beyond the finish / The construction

Cabinet construction. Made visible.

The sample shows the door frame, a separate center panel, the face frame and the cabinet box. Each component has its own place in this Shaker construction.

Cabinet sample with exposed frame, panel joints and layered edges
Shaker construction: door frame, center panel, face frame and cabinet box. The cutaway helps locate these parts; confirm each material in the specifications for the selected cabinet.

01 / Door frame

The Shaker door has rails and stiles around a separate center panel. The frame and center panel are different components; confirm their materials in the specifications for the selected cabinet.

02 / Face frame

The face frame surrounds the opening at the front of the cabinet box and sits behind the doors. The face frame, door frame and cabinet box are separate parts.

03 / Cabinet box

The sample exposes the cabinet sides, interior surfaces and layered edges. The image does not establish the wood species or material specification of a selected cabinet.

The collection

Find your space.

Kitchens

Bathrooms